Enough with the Perfect Smile: Why Transparency in Employer Branding Matters More than Polished Messages

Yes, every company claims to be amazing—offering fantastic work culture, outstanding training opportunities, and unbeatable working conditions. But really? Overblown, interchangeable employer branding campaigns don’t help when it comes to attracting and retaining talent.

Today’s labor market is characterized by a shortage of skilled workers, shifting values, and a growing distrust of corporate messaging. Candidates no longer want marketing slogans—they expect credible insights and authentic communication.

Photo by Dan Wallace found at Unsplash

In uncertain times, credibility and transparency are crucial. For example, Bosch recently announced plans to reduce its workforce by up to 13,000 jobs. Other companies will follow. For those affected, the impact is severe—companies face scrutiny not only for their decisions, but also for how they communicate them.

This presents a core dilemma: how can employer branding attract top talent when tough truths must be shared? Transparent, honest communication—openly addressing both benefits and realities—is the answer.

Why transparency in employer branding is non-negotiable

A polished image may have been enough to attract talent in the past, but those days are now behind us. Candidates can—and do—verify claims instantly:

• On employer review platforms like Kununu or Glassdoor.

• In Google reviews of company sites.

• Across social media, where employees and alumni share unfiltered experiences.

  
  

So, when there’s a gap between employer branding and real experience, it’s quickly exposed. The core argument is that transparency and acknowledgment of challenges build more lasting trust than avoiding them.

Transparency does not mean exposing weaknesses

One common source of resistance comes from marketing and communications departments. Their concern is that being too open about issues could scare off candidates or harm their brand reputation.

Transparency is not airing every problem. Set realistic expectations: Highlight advantages and describe conditions honestly.

• Don’t ignore challenges—contextualize them.

• Show what actions are being taken to improve.

• 
  

Example: Instead of writing “We offer great work-life balance”, say:

“Our employees work an average of 40 hours per week. In peak times, it may be more, but we actively make sure workloads are balanced.”

Of course, this only works if “peak times” really are the exception. If long hours are the norm, that’s a different issue the company must address first.

Corporate crises as a stress test for employer branding

Events like the Bosch layoffs—or similar restructurings at other companies—highlight the importance of consistent employer branding. Why?

• Candidates are closely watching how companies treat their employees.

• Employees become amplifiers: when treated fairly, they’ll say so—internally and externally.

• Credibility determines trust: it’s the deciding factor in whether talent will still consider a company during or after a crisis.

• 
  

That’s why, in a crisis, it’s better to say:

“We must reduce jobs to remain future-proof. At the same time, we are investing in new business areas and providing retraining opportunities.”

Addressing risks directly, instead of solely promoting opportunities, is the core of authentic employer branding. This honesty is ultimately more compelling and trusted by candidates.

The benefits of transparent employer communication

• More relevant applications: Candidates who apply with full knowledge are a better cultural fit.

• Fewer disappointments: New hires know what to expect.

• Stronger retention: Credibility builds trust throughout the organization.

• Reduced turnover: Employees who start with realistic expectations are more likely to stay.

Key channels for credible employer branding

Employer review platforms

Kununu and Glassdoor are often the first stop for candidates. Companies should:

• Actively respond to feedback.

• Address criticism constructively and share improvements.

• Encourage employees to share honest perspectives.

  
  

Google reviews

Highly visible but often overlooked: site reviews on Google. Companies should:

• Respond to all reviews—including critical ones.

• Share authentic photos and genuine insights from the workplace.

  
  

Career websites

The career site remains the central touchpoint. Transparency here means:

• Realistic visuals: Use actual workplace photos and videos, not stock images.

• Employee voices: Testimonials should include both positive and challenging experiences.

• Clear facts: Be upfront about benefits, working hours, and salary ranges.

  
  

Social media

LinkedIn, Instagram, or even TikTok can showcase authentic insights:

• Short, unpolished posts are often more credible than highly produced videos.

• Employee advocates are more persuasive than corporate accounts.

Bringing transparency into job ads

Job postings are usually the first direct interaction with candidates. Transparent ads include:

• Clear breakdown of tasks: “60% project work, 20% client contact, 20% internal coordination.”

• Honest about challenges: “High travel required” or “Dynamic environment with frequent shifts in priorities.”

• Evidence-based promises: Instead of “We invest in training” → “Employees receive an average of 5 training days per year.”

• Realistic culture descriptions: “We are growing fast—this means quick decisions, and yes, sometimes chaos.”

  
  

This ensures applicants feel respected, not misled.

How companies can embed transparency long-term

1. Assess reality: Which values are truly lived, and where are the gaps?

2. Involve employees: Gather and showcase real stories.

3. Develop consistent messaging: HR, marketing, and leadership must align their efforts to ensure a unified message.

4. Establish feedback loops: Take reviews seriously and act on them.

5. Build openness into leadership: Train managers and communication teams to handle criticism constructively and effectively.

Risks—and why they’re manageable

Yes, there are risks:

• Some candidates may be put off.

• Critical reviews remain online.

• 
  

Yet the greater risk comes from making promises that reality can’t deliver. The broken trust from a disconnect between branding and real experience causes more harm than being transparent from the outset.

Transparency as a competitive edge

Especially in times of crisis, true credibility is revealed. Companies like Bosch are under scrutiny—not only because of job cuts, but also because of how they communicate and treat people throughout the process.

For employer branding, the key principles are:

• Less staging, more substance.

• Honest, consistent communication across all channels.

• Job postings are an opportunity to set realistic expectations.

  
  

Authenticity—not a flawless image—is the foundation of trust and long-term talent attraction, especially during challenging times. The primary argument is that transparency provides companies with a genuine competitive advantage.

Incidentally, it is always a bad decision to completely abandon employer branding in times of crisis—unfortunately, this is often done. Effective employer branding helps retain the people needed to overcome the crisis. And there will be a time after the crisis—if the employer's image is in ruins, it will take years to repair it.