Optimizing Recruiting Marketing with AI? A Quick Reality Check
- Marcus

- Oct 22, 2025
- 4 min read
I recently saw a viral "Job Ad from Hell" on LinkedIn—hilarious for all the wrong reasons. It’s a prime example of clumsy AI use in recruiting, and a reminder that DEI standards still vary greatly by region.

Rather than focusing on poor examples, I wanted to explore what happens when AI is given a genuinely useful task.
To explore this, I prompted my favorite assistant to analyze what the “perfect” job ad would look like for each generation, considering values and expectations from Boomers to Gen Alpha.
The results turned out to be surprisingly solid. This prompted a closer look at what makes a universally strong job ad, regardless of generation.
The Basics: What Every Good Job Ad Needs (No Matter the Generation)
Before reviewing generational nuances, AI summarized what every strong job ad should include, and most points were accurate.
Here’s what it came up with:
Core Building Blocks
Clear title & compelling hook
→ No internal jargon; use a short, benefit-oriented line (“Help shape our AI vision”).
Key responsibilities
→ Short, specific bullets. Prioritize what truly matters.
Requirements / qualifications
→ Distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves.
Benefits & value for candidates
→ Salary range, flexibility, learning opportunities, and company culture.
Career development paths
→ Be transparent about growth and timelines.
Work model / location
→ Hybrid? Remote? In-office? Say it clearly.
About the company & culture
→ Brief intro + authentic visuals or videos.
Recruiting process overview
→ What steps, how long, who to contact.
Strong call-to-action
→ “Apply now,” “Video introduction possible,” etc.
Transparency & authenticity
→ Avoid buzzwords. Be real about the job and culture.
Biggest Candidate Turn-Offs
No salary information.
Buzzword overload (“rockstar,” “disruptive,” “agile” — without meaning).
Endless, unclear processes.
No insight into culture or leadership.
No visual or video content.
Empty promises (e.g., “hybrid” that means “always in the office”).
So far, this already outperforms most job ads out there. But generational differences still shape what resonates, so let’s explore what AI uncovered about each group.
How AI Described Each Generation (and Why It’s Not Totally Wrong)
Baby Boomers (1946–1964) | Loyalty, security, respect, recognition | Stability, health benefits, pension plans, appreciation for experience | Formal, respectful, classic channels (phone, personal contact) | Overly youthful tone, slang, “startup vibes” | Still reachable via print, networks, or associations |
Gen X (1965–1980) | Security, structure, balance, reliability | Long-term perspective, clear processes, balance | Serious, straightforward, professional | Too casual, all-remote if role needs presence | Appreciate early personal contact & process clarity |
Gen Y / Millennials (1981–1996) | Flexibility, purpose, growth, feedback | Learning, mentoring, purpose, culture, remote options | Professional yet human | Vague benefits, rigid systems | Transparency & development matter most |
Gen Z (1997–2012) | Purpose, transparency, authenticity, wellbeing | Salary transparency, flexibility, mental health, diversity | Short, visual, video-first, mobile-friendly | Long forms, corporate tone, silence after applying | 85% skip ads without salary info; videos perform best |
Gen Alpha (2010–) | Digital natives, speed, interactivity, curiosity | Interactive, tech-driven, gamified, learning focus | Visual, mobile-first, bite-sized | Long text, static PDFs | Focus on learning agility & tech tools |
The AI emphasized that its findings are broad guidelines and that generational differences exist, but individual preferences always vary.
Not every Gen Z is a TikTok influencer, and not every Boomer reads newspapers.
Ideal Job Ad Layout: What Works Across Generations
According to AI—and I agree—most generational differences can be addressed through layout and design.
Suggested layout:
Visual header: logo, title, slogan, team photo
Elevator pitch: 2–3 sentences on purpose and impact
Main blocks (with icons):
Tasks & responsibilities
Requirements
Benefits & extras
Career & development
Work model / location
Culture & values
Interactive visuals: images, short clips, icons, even clickable FAQs
Process & contact info: clear steps + real person behind the ad
Call to action: “Apply in 5 minutes,” “Record a short intro video,” etc.
Design principles:
Clear sections, whitespace, consistent fonts
Mobile-first, responsive
Accessible (readable text, contrast, alt text)
Real photos > stock images
Short paragraphs, visual storytelling
Where to Publish: Channels by Generation
No surprises here — AI recommended what we all know, but summarized neatly:
Boomers | Local newspapers, print, associations, referrals | Combine digital + offline touchpoints |
Gen X | LinkedIn, industry portals, business networks | Clarity & structure win trust |
Gen Y | LinkedIn, company career page, Instagram, blogs | Invest in content & SEO |
Gen Z | TikTok, Instagram, YouTube Shorts, LinkedIn | Use video, short text, clear CTAs |
Gen Alpha | Social apps, mobile recruiting, chatbots | Fast, visual, mobile-only experience |
Cross-generation best practices:
Central career site with culture insights and authentic visuals.
Active social presence (video, day-in-the-life content).
Employee referral programs.
Campus partnerships, early engagement.
Mobile-optimized job apps.
Events, fairs, and hybrid recruiting formats.
Targeted ads — but beware of algorithmic bias.
Generational Expectations During the Recruiting Process
AI also offered insights into what each generation expects after they apply — and these are spot on.
Gen Alpha | Fast, mobile-first, interactive, learning opportunities |
Gen Z | Honesty, quick feedback, wellbeing focus, transparency |
Gen Y | Work-life balance, coaching, meaningful work, inclusion |
Gen X | Reliability, structure, respect, stability |
Boomers | Security, appreciation, respectful treatment |
"Universal truths":
Slow feedback kills interest.
Transparency builds trust.
Consistency between “promise” and “practice” is essential.
Even rejections deserve personal, respectful communication.
Conclusion: AI Can Help — But Don’t Let It Take Over
No groundbreaking surprises here.
We're already on the right track in many ways.
AI helps with structure, tone, and consistency, but can't replace human nuance.
Used wisely, AI saves time—letting HR focus on genuine, human connections.
AI can help write a good job ad. But humans make the connection real.









Comments